Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 152/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 151/02

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 150/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 149/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond August 3, 1999.

  • Decision # 148/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for September 21 and September 24 to 28, 2001.

  • Decision # 147/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond December 15, 2000.

  • Decision # 146/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 145/02

    Issue: Whether or not a compensable loss of earning capacity exists effective October 6, 2001; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 144/02

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for costs associated with the completion of insurance forms; and Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for costs associated with the purchase of a pair of shoes.

  • Decision # 143/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 142/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 17, 2002.

  • Decision # 141/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of her October 26, 2000 compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits beyond July 13, 2001.

  • Decision # 140/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period August 25 to August 28, 2001 inclusive.

  • Decision # 139/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 138/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 11, 2000.

  • Decision # 137/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing back problems are related to the compensable injury of March 24, 2001.

  • Decision # 136/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits beyond March 29, 2000.

  • Decision # 135/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 5, 1998.

  • Decision # 134/02

    Issue: Whether or not a relationship exists between the need for medical treatment effective September 10, 2001 and the compensable injury of September 4, 2001; and Whether or not a relationship exists between the claimant's reduced work capabilities effective September 10, 2001 and the compensable injury of September 4, 2001.

  • Decision # 133/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 132/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's time loss from work between October 23, 2001 and October 27, 2001 and related medical expenses.

  • Decision # 131/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's widow is entitled to benefits under subsection 29(1)(a)(ii) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 130/02

    Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay the late filing penalty of $2,940.47; and Whether or not the employer must pay the late payment penalty of $635.38.

  • Decision # 129/02

    Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay the late filing penalty of $1,951.37; and Whether or not the employer must pay the late payment penalty of $375.50.

  • Decision # 128/02

    Issue: Whether or not the $150.00 late reporting penalty assessed against the employer should be waived.