Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 43/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 16, 1998.

  • Decision # 42/01

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under section 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 41/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full wage loss benefits in relation to his current back complaints; and Whether or not the claimant's vocational rehabilitation plan was appropriate.

  • Decision # 40/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant’s right of action is removed pursuant to Section 68(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 39/01

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed earning capacity of minimum wage for a 40 hour week should be implemented effective March 4, 2000; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an attendant's allowance beyond September 23, 2000.

  • Decision # 38/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 4, 1999.

  • Decision # 36/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 2, 1999.

  • Decision # 34/01

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility can be accepted for the claimant's back and left hip problems as being related to the compensable injury of May 6, 1998.

  • Decision # 33/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 32/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period May 29, 2000 to June 7, 2000, inclusive.

  • Decision # 30/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/01

    Issue: Whether or not, as of April 2, 1999, the claimant had recovered from the effects of her compensable injury.

  • Decision # 28/01

    Issue: Whether or not there is a cause and effect relationship between the claimant's present difficulties and the injuries sustained on August 16, 1996.

  • Decision # 27/01

    Issue: Whether or not the problems incurred by the claimant beyond June 22, 1999 are related to the compensable injuries sustained on May 8, 1999.

  • Decision # 26/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/01

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 24/01

    Issue: Whether or not the cost of the claimant's yard maintenance should be paid by the WCB.

  • Decision # 23/01

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable; and Whether a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 22/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond April 29, 1998.

  • Decision # 21/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond May 19, 1999.

  • Decision # 20/01

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 19/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.