Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 42/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award based on the examination of June 28, 1999.

  • Decision # 41/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for massage therapy treatment.

  • Decision # 40/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits effective June 16, 2002.

  • Decision # 39/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's time loss from work commencing July 30, 2001 is related to the compensable accident of July 26, 2001.

  • Decision # 38/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant was fit to return to a modified graduated return to work program as of November 19, 2001; and Whether or not the claimant was fit to return to full duties as of December 3, 2001.

  • Decision # 37/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should have a deemed earning capacity of $324.00 per week.

  • Decision # 36/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker had recovered from the effects of the compensable injury as of June 2, 2001.

  • Decision # 35/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Disability award for the effects of his work related accident of March 25, 1985.

  • Decision # 34/03

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept financial responsibility for an ambulance bill on June 29, 2002.

  • Decision # 33/03

    Issue: Claimant's Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to compensation benefits beyond December 14, 2001. Employer's Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for tinnitus.

  • Decision # 31/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 30/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/03

    Issue: Whether or not the impairment has been correctly rated; Whether or not the monetary award should have been reduced for age factors in accordance with Section 38(3) of the Act; and Whether or not the impairment award should be reduced due to a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 28/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full temporary total disability benefits for the period January 1, 1996 to December 25, 2001; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to reimbursement of costs associated with long distance telephone calls to the WCB.

  • Decision # 27/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has been overpaid; and Whether or not the overpayment has to be repaid.

  • Decision # 26/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/03

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the claim beyond December 15, 2000.

  • Decision # 24/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 19, 2001; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment beyond September 13, 2001.

  • Decision # 23/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 22/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for medical treatment beginning January 3, 2001; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective January 3, 2001.

  • Decision # 21/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 19/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 18/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed right knee surgery.