Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 31/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility for wage loss and medical treatment should be extended to May 18, 2000.

  • Decision # 30/02

    Issue: Whether or not the Workers Compensation Board should charge the employer premiums for special coverage from January 1, 2001 to August 22, 2001, plus subsequent late payment penalties.

  • Decision # 29/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant’s right of action is removed pursuant to Section 68(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 28/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 27/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 12, 2000.

  • Decision # 26/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond April 9, 1997.

  • Decision # 25/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's current and ongoing back difficulties are related to either his 1976 and/or 1977 compensable accidents.

  • Decision # 23/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 6, 2001.

  • Decision # 22/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should have a deemed earning capacity of minimum wage for the period September 22, 2001 to November 15, 2001; and Whether or not the worker should have a deemed earning capacity of $314.00 per week, effective November 16, 2001.

  • Decision # 21/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period August 3 to August 4, 2000.

  • Decision # 19/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 18/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's headaches and neck problems are related to the workplace injury of June 30, 1998; Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits beyond February 29, 2000; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 16/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's foot problems are related to the compensable injury of January 26, 1994; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits beyond January 1, 1997.

  • Decision # 15/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to temporary total disability benefits beyond March 19, 1993.

  • Decision # 14/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 12/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond June 24, 1999.

  • Decision # 10/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of temporary total disability benefits for the period February 16, 1991 to January 22, 1992; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 09/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/02

    Issue: Whether or not the component of the applicant’s permanent partial disability relating to her feet has been properly calculated;Whether or not the effective date for all components of the applicant’s permanent partial disability award should be February 4, 1977; andWhether or not the applicant is entitled to reimbursement for the costs associated with a jetted hot tub.

  • Decision # 08/02

    Issue: Whether or not the November 27, 2000 left eye surgery is causally related to the compensable accident of February 27, 1984.