Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 106/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of temporary total disability benefits beyond August 6, 1999.

  • Decision # 105/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 104/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 20, 2000.

  • Decision # 103/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 102/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 101/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current symptomatology is causally related to the compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 5, 1995.

  • Decision # 100/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has recovered from the effects of her right shoulder complaints as of February 15, 2001.

  • Decision # 99/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond May 18, 2001.

  • Decision # 98/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing difficulties with his coccyx are related to the compensable injury of March 17, 2000; and Whether or not the worker sustained a recurrence of his compensable injury of March 17, 2000 on October 5, 2001, which precluded him from returning to his usual work.

  • Decision # 97/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/02

    Issue: Whether or not the Workers Compensation Board should charge the employer the late filing penalty of $416.60.

  • Decision # 95/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right carpal tunnel syndrome.

  • Decision # 94/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between April 1993 and August 1993; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 1999; Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating should have been reduced by 50%; Whether or not the worker is entitled to the full cash value of an unreduced permanent partial impairment rating; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation assistance.

  • Decision # 93/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's self-employment proposal should be supported; and Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity should have been implemented.

  • Decision # 91/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 20, 2001.

  • Decision # 90/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for the period October 10, 1990 to April 7, 1993; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for the period December 1, 1993 to January 30, 1994.

  • Decision # 89/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's travel costs to Calgary, including time loss from work and chiropractic costs above those that would normally be paid through the WCB's chiropractic guidelines.

  • Decision # 88/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 87/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 85/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment was correctly rated at 1% entitling him to a lump sum payment of $416.00.

  • Decision # 84/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is fit to perform his pre-accident duties as of June 29, 2001; and Whether or not the worker is overpaid temporary total disability benefits from June 29, 2001 to August 7, 2001.

  • Decision # 83/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/02

    Issue: Whether or not the Workers Compensation Board (WCB) should charge the employer additional premiums for the years 1998 and 1999.