Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 100/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond February 13, 2001; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 99/04

    Issue: Whether or not there is entitlement to an extension of physiotherapy treatment; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of full wage loss benefits effective August 27, 2003.

  • Decision # 98/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 97/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits for his time loss from work commencing March 17, 2003.

  • Decision # 96/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 95/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 18, 2003.

  • Decision # 94/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act ("the Act").

  • Decision # 92/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the worker's ongoing back difficulties are related to the work injuries of August 5, 1999, January 9, 1996 or December 17, 1995.

  • Decision # 91/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits retroactive to 1974.

  • Decision # 90/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 89/04

    Issue: Whether or not the effective date of the claimant's permanent partial disability award should be May 12, 2003.

  • Decision # 88/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits commencing December 2002.

  • Decision # 85/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 83/04

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment has been correctly rated.

  • Decision # 82/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 81/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 4, 2002; and Whether or not the worker's erectile dysfunction is causally related to his workplace accident.

  • Decision # 80/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 19, 2000.

  • Decision # 79/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 28, 2002.

  • Decision # 78/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s time loss from work commencing November 15, 2002.

  • Decision # 77/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.