Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 125/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 124/04

    Issue: Whether or not the bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome arose out of and in the course of the worker's employment.

  • Decision # 123/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 10, 1998.

  • Decision # 122/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 6, 2000.

  • Decision # 121/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond September 16, 1998.

  • Decision # 120/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/04

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits paid between November 1, 2003 and May 6, 2004 should be reduced based on a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage.

  • Decision # 118/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 117/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under Section 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the Act).

  • Decision # 116/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 8, 2003.

  • Decision # 115/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid benefits beyond March 25, 2002.

  • Decision # 114/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current difficulties and related treatment.

  • Decision # 112/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 111/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits for the period July 11, 2002 to July 26, 2002.

  • Decision # 110/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond September 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 109/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 108/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 15, 2002.

  • Decision # 107/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing low back complaints are attributable to injuries sustained at work on May 9, 1994, March 27, 2000 and May 30, 2002; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 11, 2002.

  • Decision # 106/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits beyond November 5, 1998.

  • Decision # 105/04

    Issue: Whether or not the September 6, 2000 compensable injury was a sequela of the May 9, 2000 compensable injury; and Whether or not the claimant had a loss of earning capacity beyond January 15, 2003 in relation to the combined effects of his three compensable accidents.

  • Decision # 104/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 103/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 102/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant experienced a recurrence of injuries sustained February 13, 1994; Whether or not a new accident occurred arising out of and in the course of the claimant's employment; Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond July 13, 1994.

  • Decision # 101/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has a compensable psychological condition; Whether or not the claimant should have a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage; Whether or not the 10% Permanent Partial Impairment award for the claimant's back condition has been properly calculated; and Whether or not the claimant's 10% Permanent Partial Impairment award for his back condition should be reduced by 50%.