Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 26/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to additional workers' compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 24/04

    Issue: Whether or not 75% of the costs in relation to this claim should be charged to a 3rd party employer.

  • Decision # 23/04

    Issue: Whether or not a loss of earning capacity exists beyond December 31, 2002; and Whether or not the claimant has been overpaid $1,152.15.

  • Decision # 22/04

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should finance the purchase of a hydrostatic tractor.

  • Decision # 21/04

    Issue: Whether or not the employer's son, who trades as his own company, is a worker of the employer for the 2000 calendar year; Whether or not the employer should be charged the inadequate return penalty of $690.23; and Whether or not the employer should be charged the over-under interest of $306.54.

  • Decision # 20/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's symptoms commencing in July 2000 are related to her compensable injury of December 22, 1996.

  • Decision # 19/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 3, 2003.

  • Decision # 18/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits between June 12, 1998 and August 19, 1999 other than the period of recovery from surgery between January 12, 1999 and June 12, 1999; and Whether or not the an overpayment in the amount of $10,310.00 exists on file.

  • Decision # 15/04

    Issue: Whether or not the condition of chronic anxiety is related to the accident of October 31, 2000.

  • Decision # 14/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/04

    Issue: Whether or the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond December 17, 2002.

  • Decision # 12/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/04

    Issue: Whether or not the employer's business activities have been correctly classified under industry code 301-03 "Wholesale Meat Products" and; Whether or not the WCB should transfer the cost experience of the previous owners of the company to the current owners.

  • Decision # 10/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility for any proposed carpal tunnel surgery should be accepted at this time.

  • Decision # 08/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 13, 2002.

  • Decision # 07/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 25, 1999.

  • Decision # 06/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond August 30, 1999.

  • Decision # 05/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 04/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 23, 2003.

  • Decision # 03/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 18, 2002.

  • Decision # 03/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to income replacement benefits commencing January 2004 because of the absence of an ergonomic chair at the workplace.