Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 131/02
Issue: Whether or not the claimant's widow is entitled to benefits under subsection 29(1)(a)(ii) of The Workers Compensation Act.
-
Decision # 130/02
Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay the late filing penalty of $2,940.47; and Whether or not the employer must pay the late payment penalty of $635.38.
-
Decision # 129/02
Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay the late filing penalty of $1,951.37; and Whether or not the employer must pay the late payment penalty of $375.50.
-
Decision # 128/02
Issue: Whether or not the $150.00 late reporting penalty assessed against the employer should be waived.
-
Decision # 127/02
Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 29, 2001 to December 18, 2001 inclusive.
-
Decision # 126/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 24, 2001.
-
Decision # 125/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period January 10, 2002 to January 25, 2002 inclusive.
-
Decision # 124/02
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 123/02
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 122/02
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 121/02
Issue: Whether or not the plaintiff’s right of action is removed pursuant to Section 68(4) of the Act.
-
Decision # 120/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period December 23, 2001 to December 29, 2001 inclusive.
-
Decision # 119/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further compensation benefits after December 12, 1998; and, Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under section 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the Act).
-
Decision # 118/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s ongoing low back problems are related to the workplace injury of November 10, 2000.
-
Decision # 117/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing November 8, 2000.
-
Decision # 116/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from January 18, 2001 to October 1, 2001.
-
Decision # 115/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 23, 2001.
-
Decision # 114/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 20, 2001.
-
Decision # 113/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker's current left shoulder complaints are related to the July 13, 1999 compensable injury.
-
Decision # 112/02
Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to reimbursement of travel expenses from Shoal Lake to Winnipeg in order to attend medical appointments.
-
Decision # 111/02
Issue: Whether or the employer is entitled to cost relief.
-
Decision # 110/02
Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 24, 2001.
-
Decision # 109/02
Issue: Whether or not worker's chronic lung problems are related to the May 26, 1954 accident.
-
Decision # 108/02
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period April 15, 2001 to May 15, 2001.
-
Decision # 107/02
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.