Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 92/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 14, to August 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 91/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to receive wage loss benefits during the period in which he received Employment Insurance Benefits.

  • Decision # 90/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is capable of working 34 hours per week on modified duties.

  • Decision # 89/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective January 10, 2001; Whether or not the right shoulder surgery which took place on August 28, 2001, is a sequela of the claimant's two compensable accidents; and Whether or not the worker is capable of returning to his pre-accident duties.

  • Decision # 88/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's ongoing lower back problems beyond July 8, 2002; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to Preventative Vocational Rehabilitation.

  • Decision # 85/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 84/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond March 15, 1995; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 83/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 82/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has recovered from her March 9, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 81/03

    Issue: Whether or not the job duties on the butcher coat line are within the claimant's physical restrictions; and Whether or not there is entitlement to wage loss benefits beyond January 11, 2002.

  • Decision # 80/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 79/03

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the worker's left knee injury of November 17, 1999.

  • Decision # 78/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's benefits should have been discontinued effective June 18, 2001.

  • Decision # 76/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 75/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits for the sporadic time loss from work to July 11, 2002; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond July 11, 2002.

  • Decision # 74/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 25, 2001.

  • Decision # 73/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond July 7, 1999.

  • Decision # 72/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 21, 2002.

  • Decision # 70/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 23, 2002.

  • Decision # 69/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's right knee condition; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 21, 2002.

  • Decision # 68/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's recent low back difficulties.