Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 150/04

    Issue: Whether or not surgical authorization should be provided for a proposed below elbow amputation of the claimant's right arm.

  • Decision # 149/04

    Issue: Whether or not the purchase of an automatic tarp covering machine should be authorized.

  • Decision # 148/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and/or services beyond July 17, 2003.

  • Decision # 147/04

    Issue: Whether or not worker's current low back symptoms are related to the October 18, 1996 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 146/04

    Issue: Whether or not financial responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of the Syncro hearing aid.

  • Decision # 145/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between June 11, 2002 and July 15, 2003; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between September 10, 2003 and October 20, 2003.

  • Decision # 144/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 4, 2003.

  • Decision # 143/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 142/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing back problems are related to his workplace injury.

  • Decision # 141/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 5, 2003.

  • Decision # 140/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a loss of earning capacity related to her 1993 injury.

  • Decision # 139/04

    Issue: Whether or not there is entitlement to wage loss benefits after November 12, 2003.

  • Decision # 138/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's treatment and time loss in April 2001 is related to her January 30, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 137/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits including wage loss beyond October 29, 2003.

  • Decision # 136/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 135/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 19, 2002 in relation to the July 1, 2002 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 134/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 133/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 21, 2003.

  • Decision # 132/04

    Issue: Whether or not the $150.00 penalty for late reporting should be assessed against the employer.

  • Decision # 131/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 4, 2003.

  • Decision # 130/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is employable in relation to the physical injuries sustained; and Whether or not the claimant's deemed post accident earning capacity is appropriate in relation to the physical injuries sustained.

  • Decision # 129/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel must be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act, to respond to questions regarding the etiology of the worker's tendonitis and carpal tunnel syndrome.

  • Decision # 128/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits beyond November 19, 2003; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's psychological condition beyond the two post November 19, 2003 treatments.

  • Decision # 127/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for medical treatment and time loss from work beyond June 2002.

  • Decision # 126/04

    Issue: 1. Whether or not R.C. is a deemed worker of the firm for 1998, 2000 and 2001 whose earnings must be reported to the WCB for assessment and claim purposes; 2. Whether or not O.S. is a deemed worker of the firm for 2002 whose earnings must be reported to the WCB for assessment and claim purposes; 3. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $1,919.04 in over-under interest charges; 4. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $3,767.62 in inadequate return penalties; and 5. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $3,143.61 in late payment penalties.