Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 106/03

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 105/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 13, 1997.

  • Decision # 104/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has sufficiently recovered from the compensable injury to the extent that there is no longer a loss of earning capacity.

  • Decision # 103/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to mileage expenses to attend chiropractic appointments in Lorette.

  • Decision # 102/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's two falls in early 2001 are related to the compensable injury of June 8, 1999.

  • Decision # 101/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's ongoing right knee problems are related to the effects of the compensable injuries occurring on December 12, 1983 or November 21, 1995.

  • Decision # 100/03

    Issue: Whether or not as of August 9, 2002, the claimant had recovered from the effects of his July 26, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 99/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 11, 2003.

  • Decision # 98/03

    Issue: Whether or not the effective date of the claimant's right shoulder permanent partial disability award should be May 14, 1998.

  • Decision # 97/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits and/or services beyond January 31, 2002.

  • Decision # 96/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 95/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond July 13, 1995; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the surgical procedure of November 12, 2002.

  • Decision # 94/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant should have a deemed post-accident earning capacity of minimum wage for a 40 hour week effective July 1, 2001; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 20, 2001.

  • Decision # 93/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 14, to August 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 91/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to receive wage loss benefits during the period in which he received Employment Insurance Benefits.

  • Decision # 90/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is capable of working 34 hours per week on modified duties.

  • Decision # 89/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective January 10, 2001; Whether or not the right shoulder surgery which took place on August 28, 2001, is a sequela of the claimant's two compensable accidents; and Whether or not the worker is capable of returning to his pre-accident duties.

  • Decision # 88/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's ongoing lower back problems beyond July 8, 2002; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to Preventative Vocational Rehabilitation.

  • Decision # 85/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 84/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond March 15, 1995; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 83/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 82/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has recovered from her March 9, 2001 compensable injury.