Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 77/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's workers compensation benefits have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 76/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 21, 2001.

  • Decision # 75/02

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 74/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's average earnings should be $410.19 per week.

  • Decision # 73/02

    Issue: Whether or not the Plaintiff's right of action is removed by the provisions of the Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 72/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's wage loss benefits should be reduced by an earning capacity of $250.00 per week.

  • Decision # 70/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for the period November 19, 2001 to December 5, 2001.

  • Decision # 69/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has entitlement to wage loss benefits after February 2, 1996 as a consequence of symptoms involving his right upper extremity; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to medical aid assistance beyond May 1, 1996 as a consequence of symptoms involving his right upper extremity.

  • Decision # 68/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under Section 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 2, 2000.

  • Decision # 67/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 9, 2001.

  • Decision # 66/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 27, 2001.

  • Decision # 65/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the periods August 31, 1999 to April 26, 2000 and June 23, 2000 to August 1, 2000.

  • Decision # 64/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the November 17, 1997 back injury.

  • Decision # 63/02

    Issue: Whether or not the costs associated with the worker's current left shoulder complaints have been charged to the appropriate claim file.

  • Decision # 62/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 61/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current complaints are related to any of her compensable injuries of August 16, 2000, February 3, 2000 or August 25, 1999; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits and services beyond December 18, 2000.

  • Decision # 60/02

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 59/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right shoulder and neck complaints are causally related to the compensable injury of November 26, 1999.

  • Decision # 58/02

    Issue: Whether or not the Workers Compensation Board should charge the employer premiums for the years 1999 and 2000.

  • Decision # 57/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 19, 2000.

  • Decision # 56/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 55/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of full wage loss benefits for the period of January 5, 2000 to May 5, 2000.

  • Decision # 54/02

    Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay WCB premiums from 1998 and 1999.

  • Decision # 53/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to benefits beyond October 10, 1995.