Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 111/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's average earnings have been calculated correctly; and Whether or not the claimant has been overpaid.

  • Decision # 110/00

    Issue: Claimant's Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits (full benefit or partial benefit) beyond September 1, 1998. Employer's Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits between May 19, 1998 and July 13, 1998.

  • Decision # 109/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant’s psychiatric condition is causally related to the hearing loss/tinnitus condition; andWhether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 108/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 107/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits after September 6, 1999.

  • Decision # 105/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits subsequent to December 1, 1994 in relation to the compensable accident of February 18, 1988.

  • Decision # 104/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an impairment award greater than 6.9%.

  • Decision # 103/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits from June 15, 1999 to the date she returned to work on July 12, 1999.

  • Decision # 102/00

    Issue: Injury Date: October 26, 1998 Whether or not the claim is acceptable. Injury Dates: November 22, 1997; July 29, 1996; January 1, 1995; September 30, 1994: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits and services in relation to her previous compensable injuries.

  • Decision # 101/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to additional benefits with respect to his left thumb injury of May 2, 1974.

  • Decision # 100/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has recovered from the effects of the January 19, 1998 compensable injury; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of benefits beyond April 17, 1998.

  • Decision # 99/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to temporary total disability benefits beyond June 15, 1999.

  • Decision # 98/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant’s deemed post accident earning capacity should be $311.60 per week (later adjusted to $314.78 as a result of indexing); andWhether or not the claimant is entitled to a new vocational rehabilitation program.

  • Decision # 97/00

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage for a forty hour week should have been implemented effective March 19, 2000; and Whether or not the claimant's restrictions should be changed.

  • Decision # 96/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has permanent physical restrictions related to the effects of the 1991 accident or to a combination of any or all of the compensable accidents.

  • Decision # 95/00

    Issue: May 9, 1999 Right Knee injury: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 10, 1999; and Whether or not the claimant's average earnings have been correctly calculated. May 9, 1999 Hernia injury: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to benefits in relation to his hernia condition.

  • Decision # 94/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to benefits or services beyond May 25, 1999.

  • Decision # 93/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an impairment award greater than 9.2%.

  • Decision # 92/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits for time loss from work commencing October 1, 1998; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment beyond December 15, 1998.

  • Decision # 91/00

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's secondary injury sustained on May 15, 1998 when she fell at home.

  • Decision # 90/00

    Issue: Whether or not the Permanent Partial Disability rating of 3% is accurate; Whether or not the effective date of the impairment award is correct as being August 30, 1964; Whether or not the wages used to calculate the impairment award of $39.85 per week is correct; and Whether or the claimant is entitled to the payment of any partial or full wage loss benefit beyond that which he has already been paid.

  • Decision # 89/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant’s right shoulder complaints subsequent to March 25, 1998, are related to his compensable injury; Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 25, 1998; andWhether or not the claimant is entitled to reimbursement of any of the costs associated with his retraining program.

  • Decision # 88/00

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 87/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant should be awarded a 3.97% permanent partial disability award.