Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 127/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s ongoing low back complaints continue to be related to the accident sustained at work on April 14, 1999; andWhether or not the work restrictions identified are considered to be permanent.

  • Decision # 125/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 124/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant has recovered from the effects of the compensable injuries sustained on August 19, 1986.

  • Decision # 123/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 122/01

    Issue: Whether or not Canada Pension Plan disabled contributor benefits should be taken into account when calculating the worker's vocational rehabilitation benefits; and Whether or not the worker has been overpaid; and Whether or not the overpayment should be recovered.

  • Decision # 121/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and lump sum settlement have been calculated correctly; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to partial wage loss benefits beyond September 16, 1998.

  • Decision # 120/01

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's recent right shoulder/arm/hand problem and any associated treatment or time loss.

  • Decision # 119/01

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's right eye difficulties as being related to the September 15, 1998 compensable injury; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for related medical and travel expenses.

  • Decision # 118/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits following the compensable injury of November 9, 1998.

  • Decision # 117/01

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to Section 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 116/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 25, 1996.

  • Decision # 115/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's Canada Pension Plan Disabled Contributor Benefits should be deducted from his special additional compensation; Whether or not the claimant's permanent partial disability award should be deducted from his income replacement benefits; and Whether or not the American Medical Association Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment should be used in calculating the claimant's permanent partial disability rating.

  • Decision # 114/01

    Issue: Whether or not the established date of accident is correct.

  • Decision # 113/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits from November 3, 2000 to November 17, 2000 inclusive.

  • Decision # 112/01

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should charge the employer premiums for 1998, 1999 and 2000.

  • Decision # 111/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period June 10, 1996 to March 25, 1997, less any periods worked.

  • Decision # 110/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond September 28, 1998.

  • Decision # 108/01

    Issue: Claimant: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 23, 2000. Employer: Whether or not the claimant was entitled to wage loss benefits and services for the period September 4, 1995 to June 23, 2000.

  • Decision # 107/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 25, 2000.

  • Decision # 106/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits and/or other services after June 27, 1997; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under Section 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 105/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 27, 1999.

  • Decision # 104/01

    Issue: Whether or not a penalty under Section 18(4) of The Workers Compensation Act should have been imposed on the employer.

  • Decision # 103/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 23, 2000.