Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 34/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for thecost of purchasing the worker's van.

  • Decision # 33/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits inrelation to the workplace accidents occurring June 14, 2011 and June 7, 2012.

  • Decision # 31/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 30/16

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with a goal of employability in National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6623, Other Elemental Sales, is appropriate; and Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits were correctly reduced in accordance with the vocational rehabilitation plan effective October 6, 2014.

  • Decision # 29/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss andmedical aid benefits beyond the date of accident.

  • Decision # 26/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled tobenefits after June 28, 2012.

  • Decision # 25/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 23/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for right-sided hearing loss isacceptable.

  • Decision # 22/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits afterMarch 31, 2015.

  • Decision # 21/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits; and Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 20/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for therepair of his right hearing aid.

  • Decision # 19/16

    Issue: 2007 Workplace Injury Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 7, 2008; 1992, 1986 and 1977 Workplace Injuries Whether or not the worker's current left knee difficulties are a consequence of the workplace injuries sustained October 15, 1992, September 5, 1986, May 21, 1986, February 3, 1986 and/or May 27, 1977.

  • Decision # 18/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsafter February 15, 2012.

  • Decision # 16/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled tobenefits after November 19, 2014.

  • Decision # 15/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsfor her absence from work on January 16, 2015.

  • Decision # 14/16

    Issue: Whether or not a post-accident deemed earning capacity should be implemented effective October 24, 2014; and Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating for airway sensitivity and chronic rhinitis has been properly established.

  • Decision # 13/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to furtherchiropractic treatment.

  • Decision # 10/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted forcoverage of Hydromorphone Contin after August 19, 2015.