Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 59/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after March 26, 2013.

  • Decision # 58/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits

  • Decision # 57/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 56/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 27, 2015.

  • Decision # 55/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 4, 2010 in relation to his cervical and low back difficulties; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 11, 2011.

  • Decision # 54/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 52/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond April 26, 2013.

  • Decision # 51/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for costs associated with supplemental oxygen after October 31, 2013; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to an independent living allowance beyond December 2013.

  • Decision # 49/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 48/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's bilateral wrist and thumb difficulties as being a consequence of the September 10, 2007 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 47/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 46/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 2% has been correctly established.

  • Decision # 45/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's PPI rating of 4.9 % has been correctly calculated; and,Whether or not the monetary amount of the worker's PPI award of $5,000 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 44/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 21, 2015

  • Decision # 42/16

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to footwear or orthotics.

  • Decision # 40/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 21, 2014

  • Decision # 39/16

    Issue:   Whether or not the worker's current right shoulder/arm and neck problems are related to the March 13, 2006 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 38/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable

  • Decision # 37/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 20, 2014

  • Decision # 36/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairmentrating has been correctly established at 5%.