Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 84/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left ankle difficulties are related to the compensable injury of July 29, 1999.

  • Decision # 83/16

    Issue: Whether or not the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is acceptable in relation to the workplace accident of October 10, 2012; Whether or not the diagnosis of Post-Concussion Syndrome is acceptable in relation to the workplace accident of October 10, 2012; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 82/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to concurrent physiotherapy and chiropractic treatment.

  • Decision # 81/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period July 16, 2015 to August 3, 2015.

  • Decision # 80/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 79/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/16

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 77/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 76/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further cortisone injections.

  • Decision # 75/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 74/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the December 19, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 72/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's anterior cruciate ligament tear of the right knee is related to the July 2, 2010 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 69/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 68/16

    Issue: Date of Accident - January 20, 2014: Whether or not the claim is acceptable. Date of Accident - January 1, 2008: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 67/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award for hearing loss.

  • Decision # 66/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of working full hours within her permanent restrictions; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 6, 2014; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period September 9, 2014 to October 5, 2014.

  • Decision # 65/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 63/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 27, 2015.

  • Decision # 62/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 61/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to reimburse the overpayment of benefits to the WCB.

  • Decision # 60/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to his workplace injury of October 25, 2011.