Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 174/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Disability award.

  • Decision # 173/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's Permanent Partial Disability rating of 3.30% has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 172/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 171/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 26, 2015.

  • Decision # 170/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 7, 2014.

  • Decision # 169/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties after December 10, 2013; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right shoulder surgery.

  • Decision # 168/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left knee medial meniscus tear is acceptable as a consequence of the June 7, 2015 compensable accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits.

  • Decision # 167/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial disability rating is correct.

  • Decision # 166/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 165/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 164/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/16

    Issue: Whether there is coverage for chiropractic treatment beyond July 31, 2015.

  • Decision # 162/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 161/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 26, 2012.

  • Decision # 160/16

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 100% cost relief.

  • Decision # 159/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for the period between January 30, 2009 to February 4, 2015.

  • Decision # 158/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 157/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 156/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 155/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of a hearing aid for the worker's left ear.

  • Decision # 154/16

    Issue: Accident Date: August 15, 2001Whether or not the worker's psychological condition is related to the August 15, 2001 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 6, 2016.Accident Date: April 26, 1985Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist difficulties in relation to the April 26, 1985 accident.

  • Decision # 153/16

    Issue: Whether or not the 5% permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly established; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to a monetary award in relation to the impairment rating.

  • Decision # 152/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 16, 2016.

  • Decision # 151/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 150/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 8, 2015.