Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 109/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings and benefit rate have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 108/16

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $497.15 per week effective February 23, 2015 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 107/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 106/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 6, 2015.

  • Decision # 105/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss or medical aid benefits after March 4, 2015.

  • Decision # 103/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 4, 2014; and Whether or not there is entitlement to medical aid benefits in addition to the worker's dental injuries.

  • Decision # 102/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 3, 2012 in relation to his left shoulder.

  • Decision # 101/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 100/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to travel expenses in order to attend a CT scan.

  • Decision # 99/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 98/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 6, 2015.

  • Decision # 97/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his Permanent Partial Disability rating and award.

  • Decision # 96/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility for legal fees for the Passing of Accounts and/or for real property associated with committeeship for the worker should be accepted.

  • Decision # 94/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable

  • Decision # 94/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 24, 2015.

  • Decision # 93/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits after August 6, 2015.

  • Decision # 91/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left shoulder difficulties are a consequence of the October 24, 2014 workplace accident.

  • Decision # 90/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 89/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 88/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 31, 2009.

  • Decision # 87/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to repay the $3881.78 overpayment.

  • Decision # 86/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the September 29, 2014 physiotherapy assessment; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for a foam roller; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2015.

  • Decision # 85/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 1, 2010; Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits for the period November 2 to November 29, 2010; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder condition as being a consequence of the March 28, 2009 accident.