Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 158/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 157/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 156/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 155/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of a hearing aid for the worker's left ear.

  • Decision # 154/16

    Issue: Accident Date: August 15, 2001Whether or not the worker's psychological condition is related to the August 15, 2001 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 6, 2016.Accident Date: April 26, 1985Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist difficulties in relation to the April 26, 1985 accident.

  • Decision # 153/16

    Issue: Whether or not the 5% permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly established; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to a monetary award in relation to the impairment rating.

  • Decision # 152/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 16, 2016.

  • Decision # 151/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 150/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 8, 2015.

  • Decision # 149/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 148/16

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for National Occupational Classification 6421, Retail Salesperson and Sales Clerks, is appropriate.

  • Decision # 147/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award of 13% and the monetary award of $14,170.00 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 146/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 23, 2014.

  • Decision # 145/16

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 144/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 143/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for prescription medications Effexor and Lorazepam after December 31, 2015.

  • Decision # 142/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period May 16, 2011 to January 20, 2013; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period January 21, 2013 to July 23, 2015.

  • Decision # 141/16

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 140/16

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to pay the reduced late filing penalty of $508.25.

  • Decision # 139/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 138/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left inguinal hernia surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 1, 2011.

  • Decision # 137/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Impairment award.

  • Decision # 136/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's shingles condition is a consequence of his July 29, 2014 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 135/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits after April 27, 2015.

  • Decision # 134/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 9, 2015.