Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 50/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 49/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 4.6% has been properly established; andWhether or not there is a limited duration of wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 48/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 47/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 46/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the overpayment of wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 45/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 44/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits.

  • Decision # 43/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for April 14 and 15, 2016.

  • Decision # 40/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 39/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/17

    Issue: Employer Appeal:Whether or not the worker sustained an injury to his right eye as a result of the May 2, 2013 accident; andWhether or not the worker's left eye difficulties subsequent to May 10, 2013 are a consequence of the May 2, 2013 accident.Worker Appeal:Whether or not the worker's right eye difficulties after May 2, 2013 are a consequence of the May 2, 2013 accident.

  • Decision # 34/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 33/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 32/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 11, 2015.

  • Decision # 30/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 29/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after December 8, 2015; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 15, 2015.

  • Decision # 28/17

    Issue: Whether or not recovery of the overpayment would result in financial hardship.

  • Decision # 27/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's condition of lateral epicondylitis should be accepted as being a consequence of the worker's employment duties.

  • Decision # 26/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.