Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 150/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 22, 2016.
-
Decision # 149/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 148/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.
-
Decision # 147/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker's post-accident deemed earning capacity should be $156.00 per week effective November 28, 2000.
-
Decision # 146/17
Issue: Accident Date: May 5, 2015:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 14, 2015; andAccident Date: June 10, 2016:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 145/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 12, 2016.
-
Decision # 144/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 143/17
Issue: Date of Accident: August 31, 2016Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andDate of Accident: September 2, 2016Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 142/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 19, 2016.
-
Decision # 141/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss and/or medical aid benefits in relation to the incidents that occurred in March 2016.
-
Decision # 140/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 139/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 15, 2016.
-
Decision # 138/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 137/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 136/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker requires ongoing bilateral wrist restrictions; Whether or not the worker is entitled to further temporary total disability benefits; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.
-
Decision # 135/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits.
-
Decision # 134/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 7, 2016.
-
Decision # 133/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 132/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 31, 2016.
-
Decision # 131/17
Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.
-
Decision # 130/17
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right knee difficulties as being a consequence of the April 12, 2012 accident.
-
Decision # 129/17
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 128/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 127/17
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further costs associated with the rental of a power wheelchair; andWhether or not the worker's escort is entitled to wage loss benefits for May 25, 2016.
-
Decision # 126/17
Issue: Whether or not the worker experienced a recurrence of her psychological difficulties; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.