Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 32/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period December 19, 2015 to January 23, 2016; andWhether or not the worker has been overpaid.
-
Decision # 31/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to any further benefits in relation to his left knee injury:1. Coverage for chiropractic treatment costs; 2. Coverage for physiotherapy treatment and costs; 3. Coverage for orthotics; 4. Time loss and wage loss benefits; .5. Coverage for prescriptions; and 6. Acceptance of a recurrence of injury in May 2016 and related wage and time loss coverage.
-
Decision # 30/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 29/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 28/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and/or medical benefits after August 5, 2016.
-
Decision # 27/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from July 20, 2015 to July 31, 2015.
-
Decision # 26/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.
-
Decision # 25/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.
-
Decision # 24/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker was overpaid benefits in the amount of $3,086.68 for 2016 and $703.44 for 2017; andWhether or not the overpayments must be repaid.
-
Decision # 23/18
Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of the Act.
-
Decision # 22/18
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the L4-L5 disc protrusion as being a consequence of the compensable accident; andWhether or not the established post-accident earnings capacity remains accurate.
-
Decision # 21/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 20/18
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the July 21, 2015 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 5, 2017.
-
Decision # 19/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for March 3, 2017.
-
Decision # 18/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 26, 2017.
-
Decision # 17/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 16/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker was entitled to further benefits.
-
Decision # 15/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 14/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 20, 2016.
-
Decision # 13/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss or medical aid benefits.
-
Decision # 12/18
Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be charged 50% of the claim costs in relation to an injury sustained by a worker employed by another firm.
-
Decision # 11/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 10/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional physiotherapy treatment.
-
Decision # 09/18
Issue: Whether or not the right of action filed by a worker against his employer and two co-workers of the employer is barred pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
-
Decision # 08/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 19, 2015.