Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 41/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the February 6, 2012 accident.

  • Decision # 40/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after January 15, 2016 in relation to his lower back injury.

  • Decision # 39/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 25, 2014.

  • Decision # 38/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after July 24, 2014.

  • Decision # 37/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable as a new accident occurring on August 4, 2015.

  • Decision # 36/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 35/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 27, 2016.

  • Decision # 34/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 32/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period December 19, 2015 to January 23, 2016; andWhether or not the worker has been overpaid.

  • Decision # 31/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to any further benefits in relation to his left knee injury:1. Coverage for chiropractic treatment costs; 2. Coverage for physiotherapy treatment and costs; 3. Coverage for orthotics; 4. Time loss and wage loss benefits; .5. Coverage for prescriptions; and 6. Acceptance of a recurrence of injury in May 2016 and related wage and time loss coverage.

  • Decision # 30/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and/or medical benefits after August 5, 2016.

  • Decision # 27/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from July 20, 2015 to July 31, 2015.

  • Decision # 26/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 25/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 24/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was overpaid benefits in the amount of $3,086.68 for 2016 and $703.44 for 2017; andWhether or not the overpayments must be repaid.

  • Decision # 23/18

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 22/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the L4-L5 disc protrusion as being a consequence of the compensable accident; andWhether or not the established post-accident earnings capacity remains accurate.

  • Decision # 21/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the July 21, 2015 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 5, 2017.

  • Decision # 19/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for March 3, 2017.

  • Decision # 18/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 17/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.