Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 116/18
Issue: March 7, 2017 incident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable.June 16, 2017 incident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 115/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 114/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 113/18
Issue: Employer Appeal:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Worker Appeal:Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 25, 2016.
-
Decision # 112/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.
-
Decision # 111/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 110/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 27, 2017.
-
Decision # 109/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 108/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 3, 2016.
-
Decision # 107/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits for the period of March 14, 2017 to May 31, 2017.
-
Decision # 106/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 105/18
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs associated with flanges in relation to the December 11, 2016 surgery.
-
Decision # 104/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 103/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 102/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker's bilateral hand/arm/elbow and shoulder difficulties are compensable;Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 13, 2015.
-
Decision # 101/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings effective October 4, 2017 have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 100/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 99/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable;Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 1, 2017.
-
Decision # 98/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits are considered to be wages under The Garnishment Act;Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of the Act.
-
Decision # 97/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.
-
Decision # 96/18
Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 0911 - Manufacturing Managers is appropriate;Whether or not the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $918.00 per week effective February 24, 2018 is appropriate;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's psychological difficulties as being a consequence of the February 20, 2014 accident; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medications Metformin, Ramipril, Atorvastatin, Apo-Gliclazide and Adalat in relation to the February 20, 2014 accident.
-
Decision # 95/18
Issue: Whether or not the right of action filed by an injured student against her educational institute and/or placement facility is barred pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
-
Decision # 94/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 93/18
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.
-
Decision # 92/18
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.