Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 17/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsafter February 15, 2012.

  • Decision # 16/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled tobenefits after November 19, 2014.

  • Decision # 15/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsfor her absence from work on January 16, 2015.

  • Decision # 14/16

    Issue: Whether or not a post-accident deemed earning capacity should be implemented effective October 24, 2014; and Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating for airway sensitivity and chronic rhinitis has been properly established.

  • Decision # 13/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to furtherchiropractic treatment.

  • Decision # 10/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted forcoverage of Hydromorphone Contin after August 19, 2015.

  • Decision # 09/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits inrelation to the November 5, 2009 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 08/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for hearing loss isacceptable.

  • Decision # 07/16

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for theproposed back surgery.

  • Decision # 06/16

    Issue: Claim for injury occurring December 5, 2011: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits. Claim for injury occurring March 14, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable. Claim for injury occurring September 30, 2013: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 05/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wageloss and medical aid benefits after March 19, 2015.

  • Decision # 04/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partialimpairment award.

  • Decision # 02/16

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/16

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 9, 2014.

  • Decision # 155/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the worker's benefits have been properly administered.

  • Decision # 154/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement formileage expenses.

  • Decision # 153/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairmentrating of 6.20 % and the associated financial award have been correctlycalculated.

  • Decision # 151/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits forabdominal wall seroma surgery.

  • Decision # 150/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's seizures and related conditionare a consequence of the November 20, 2012 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 149/15

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's subsequent injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 14, 2014.

  • Decision # 148/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled tobenefits after March 3, 2014.