Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 155/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the worker's benefits have been properly administered.

  • Decision # 154/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement formileage expenses.

  • Decision # 153/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairmentrating of 6.20 % and the associated financial award have been correctlycalculated.

  • Decision # 151/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits forabdominal wall seroma surgery.

  • Decision # 150/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's seizures and related conditionare a consequence of the November 20, 2012 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 149/15

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's subsequent injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 14, 2014.

  • Decision # 148/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled tobenefits after March 3, 2014.

  • Decision # 147/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's neck symptoms are related to the workplace injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to full benefits after January 26, 2015.

  • Decision # 146/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsafter July 31, 2014.

  • Decision # 145/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 144/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsfor July 27, 2013.

  • Decision # 143/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsfor the period September 23 and 24, 2013.

  • Decision # 142/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairmentrating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 141/15

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with theoccupational goal of NOC 6623 - Other Elemental Sales is appropriate.

  • Decision # 140/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for opioidprescriptions after May 24, 2012.

  • Decision # 139/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further vocationalrehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 138/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additionalpsychological treatment.

  • Decision # 137/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefitsafter September 27, 2014.

  • Decision # 136/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to his permanent partial disability rating; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to further temporary total disability benefits after October 12, 2014.

  • Decision # 135/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wageloss or medical aid benefits after July 3, 2014.

  • Decision # 134/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's snow removal allowance should have been discontinued in October 2009; Whether or not the worker is entitled to a retroactive independent living allowance to February 28, 2014 for seasonal yard work; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to a retroactive independent living allowance to February 28, 2014 for house maintenance and repairs.

  • Decision # 133/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June2, 2014.

  • Decision # 132/15

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's initial benefit rate for thefirst 12 weeks has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 131/15

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.