Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 01/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to travel expenses associated with his return to work plan.

  • Decision # 180/13

    Issue: Whether or not the assessable earnings calculation should be based on 65% of the labour percentage rate;Whether or not the firm is responsible for reporting unregistered subcontractor earnings for assessment purposes;Whether or not payments made for matters including but not limited to bonuses, vacation time, sick time, travel time, mileage or gasoline allowance, etc., are considered assessable;Whether or not reported earnings for family members are assessable; Whether or not the employer is responsible for interest and penalties levied under the Act;Whether or not the audit should be extended for up to 5 years;Whether or not the employer is in a compulsory industry; andWhether or not the employer is correctly classified.

  • Decision # 179/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 29, 2012 to March 24, 2013.

  • Decision # 178/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 177/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond July 23, 2012.

  • Decision # 176/13

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties in relation to the March 25, 2011 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 175/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits.

  • Decision # 174/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 173/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond July 25, 2012.

  • Decision # 172/13

    Issue: Whether or not full responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right hand/wrist difficulties in relation to the December 8, 2011 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 171/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond January 8, 2013.

  • Decision # 170/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 169/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after April 25, 2012 in relation to the January 17, 2012 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 168/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of accommodation costs related to personal travel.

  • Decision # 167/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 22, 2012.

  • Decision # 166/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 165/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 164/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for May 8, 2013; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 163/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current back and leg complaints are related to the May 15, 2006 compensable injury; andWhether or not the claims for accidents occurring in January 2007 and January 2008 are acceptable.

  • Decision # 162/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 161/13

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left knee and back complaints in relation to compensable right knee injury of April 16, 2011.

  • Decision # 159/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 158/13

    Issue: Worker Issues: Whether or not the correct average earnings were used in the calculation of the worker's permanent partial disability awards; andWhether or not there has been a contravention of section 15 of The Workers Compensation Act for which an offense and administrative penalty under section 16 can be levied.Employer issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits while receiving a retirement pension from the accident employer.

  • Decision # 157/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 156/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award for hearing loss.