Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 39/13

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should have been accepted for the worker's August 6, 2010 surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 8, 2011.

  • Decision # 38/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/13

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 36/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 35/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/13

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the coronary artery by-pass grafting surgery performed on July 29, 2011;Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award should be reduced by 50% due to a pre-existing condition; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 32/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 26, 2012.

  • Decision # 31/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment (acupuncture) beyond April 19, 2012.

  • Decision # 30/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 11% has been correctly established; andWhether or not the financial value of the worker's permanent partial impairment award of $11,990 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 29/13

    Issue: Injury occurring September 3, 2008 Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss or medical aid benefits; and Injury occurring May 5, 2009 or November 20, 2009Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 27/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's restrictions are appropriate;Whether or not the occupational goal of NOC 7411 - Truck Driver is appropriate;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 18, 2012;Whether or not the worker's treatment from a pain specialist should be authorized after October 5, 2010;Whether or not the worker's treatment from a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist should be authorized after May 13, 2011; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 25/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 17, 2012.

  • Decision # 24/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 23/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to massage therapy treatment; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits to attend massage therapy treatment.

  • Decision # 22/13

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 21/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a lump sum commutation of his permanent partial disability award at this time.

  • Decision # 20/13

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 19/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a compensable loss of earning capacity effective April 28, 2011 and/or February 1, 2012.

  • Decision # 18/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 9, 2012.

  • Decision # 17/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits from December 17, 2010; andWhether or not the worker must repay the overpayment of wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 16/13

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should authorize the use of Tylenol #3 medications for the worker's left shoulder condition.

  • Decision # 15/13

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to the replacement of his lost hearing aid.