Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 67/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 21, 2012.

  • Decision # 66/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 17, 2013.

  • Decision # 65/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and,Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief or transfer of costs.

  • Decision # 64/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 63/14

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 62/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 61/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from October 11, 2012 to February 21, 2013; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 5, 2013.

  • Decision # 60/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current left wrist difficulties are related to the August 15, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 59/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond May 31, 2012.

  • Decision # 57/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 56/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating for cosmetic impairment has been correctly established at 1%; andWhether or not the financial value of the permanent partial impairment award has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 55/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to funding for multi-site physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 54/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/14

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is responsible for reporting the labour portion paid to independent contractors who do not have WCB coverage; andWhether or not the labour percentages charged have been correctly established.

  • Decision # 52/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 51/14

    Issue: Whether or not the work accommodation beginning in November 2012 was within the worker's restrictions; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 21, 2012 to June 3, 2013.

  • Decision # 50/14

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 49/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 48/14

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties in relation to her claim for bilateral CTS; Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the NOC - 6623 Other Elemental Sales is appropriate; andWhether or not the implementation of a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $380.00 per week effective November 26, 2010 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 47/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 17, 2012.

  • Decision # 46/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 26, 2012.

  • Decision # 44/14

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medication Nabilone.

  • Decision # 43/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.