Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 164/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 13, 2013.

  • Decision # 162/14

    Issue: Whether or not, in addition to the left wrist condition, responsibility should be accepted for the worker's other complaints in relation to the July 30, 2003 compensable injury; andWhether or not the established deemed earning capacity is appropriate.

  • Decision # 161/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left elbow difficulties are a consequence of the January 9, 2013 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 28, 2013.

  • Decision # 160/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 159/14

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification 1453, Customer Service Information and Related Clerks is appropriate; andWhether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective January 28, 2012.

  • Decision # 158/14

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the myofascial trigger point needling treatment; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medications Venlafaxine, Baclofen and Cyclobenzabrine.

  • Decision # 157/14

    Issue: January 31, 2009 Claim:Whether or not the worker's right shoulder difficulties after March 23, 2009 are a consequence of her January 31, 2009 compensable injury.January 27, 2004 Claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 156/14

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is required to report the labour portion of accounting/bookkeeping services to the WCB.

  • Decision # 155/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 154/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 153/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 152/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 151/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's Permanent Partial Impairment Rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 150/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 21, 2014.

  • Decision # 149/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 13, 2012.

  • Decision # 148/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for noise induced hearing loss is acceptable.

  • Decision # 147/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 22, 2013.

  • Decision # 146/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits beyond December 21, 2012.

  • Decision # 145/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 144/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 143/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 142/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for reported costs/losses associated with his residence.

  • Decision # 141/14

    Issue: Whether or not for the purposes of vocational rehabilitation, the worker's place of residence should be considered Winnipeg.

  • Decision # 140/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.