Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 106/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 21, 2013.

  • Decision # 105/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond November 30, 2012.

  • Decision # 104/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to financial coverage for the rental of a scooter during personal travel.

  • Decision # 103/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 102/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss or medical aid benefits after December 10, 2010.

  • Decision # 101/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent restrictions are appropriate; andWhether or not the worker's vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate.

  • Decision # 100/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be suspended for April 3, 2013; andWhether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $410.00 per week effective April 4, 2013.

  • Decision # 99/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 11, 2011;Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid treatment beyond June 27, 2011; andWhether or not the worker requires compensable work restrictions beyond June 27, 2011.

  • Decision # 98/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond January 25, 2011.

  • Decision # 97/14

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief in regard to the worker's secondary injury.

  • Decision # 96/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond October 27, 2011.

  • Decision # 95/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 22, 2013.

  • Decision # 93/14

    Issue: Whether or not the October 29, 1996 effective date for Special Additional Compensation benefits has been correctly established; andWhether or not the worker's post-accident deemed earning capacity has been correctly indexed.

  • Decision # 92/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 89/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable for noise induced hearing loss; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 88/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent impairment rating has been correctly established; andWhether or not the permanent partial impairment award has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 87/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 9, 2013.

  • Decision # 87/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 9, 2013.

  • Decision # 86/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 85/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/14

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 19, 2013.

  • Decision # 83/14

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.