Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 125/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.
-
Decision # 124/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further coverage for chiropractic treatment.
-
Decision # 123/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the April 23, 2001 accident.
-
Decision # 122/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 28, 2018; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly determined.
-
Decision # 121/19
Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.
-
Decision # 120/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 2% has been correctly determined.
-
Decision # 119/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 7, 2018.
-
Decision # 118/19
Issue: Date of Accident: August 9, 2012:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits commencing January 6, 2017.Date of Accident: November 19, 2016:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 117/19
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right lateral epicondylosis condition as being a consequence of the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker's right shoulder permanent partial impairment rating and award have been correctly determined.
-
Decision # 116/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the accidents of January 10, 2017 and/or July 17, 2017.
-
Decision # 115/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 8, 2017 to December 26, 2017.
-
Decision # 114/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 113/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 9, 2018; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for physiotherapy treatment.
-
Decision # 112/19
Issue: Date of Accident: August 20, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident: October 11, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 111/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an allowance for footwear in addition to work boots.
-
Decision # 110/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.
-
Decision # 109/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 108/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 107/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 106/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.
-
Decision # 105/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 104/19
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further massage therapy treatment.
-
Decision # 103/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 15, 2018 in relation to his low back difficulties.
-
Decision # 102/19
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 101/19
Issue: Whether or not the worker's right shoulder difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the March 10, 2017 accident; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 13, 2017 to March 20, 2017; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 29, 2017 to April 11, 2017.