Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 130/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 16, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 129/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the accident of November 7, 2013.

  • Decision # 128/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period July 28, 2018 to December 9, 2018.

  • Decision # 127/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 13, 2014.

  • Decision # 126/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current low back difficulties are causally related to the August 13, 2001 accident.

  • Decision # 125/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 124/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further coverage for chiropractic treatment.

  • Decision # 123/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the April 23, 2001 accident.

  • Decision # 122/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 28, 2018; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 121/19

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 120/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 2% has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 119/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 7, 2018.

  • Decision # 118/19

    Issue: Date of Accident: August 9, 2012:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits commencing January 6, 2017.Date of Accident: November 19, 2016:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 117/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right lateral epicondylosis condition as being a consequence of the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker's right shoulder permanent partial impairment rating and award have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 116/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the accidents of January 10, 2017 and/or July 17, 2017.

  • Decision # 115/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 8, 2017 to December 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 114/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 9, 2018; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 112/19

    Issue: Date of Accident: August 20, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident: October 11, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 111/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an allowance for footwear in addition to work boots.

  • Decision # 110/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 109/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 108/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 107/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.