Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 67/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for the right ear.

  • Decision # 66/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 65/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 2, 2016 in relation to the September 12, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 64/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 24, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 63/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 62/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after April 15, 2020.

  • Decision # 61/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment in relation to the February 5, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 60/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in their Special Additional Compensation benefit; 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further opioid medication; and 3. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cost of medical cannabis.

  • Decision # 59/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 4, 2019 in relation to the May 27, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 58/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after May 12, 2020.

  • Decision # 57/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 56/21

    Issue: Date of Accident - June 28, 2016: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits;Date of Accident - January 25, 2017: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 55/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits (other than chiropractic treatment) after July 31, 2018 and chiropractic treatment after August 14, 2018.

  • Decision # 54/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 3, 2019.

  • Decision # 53/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for a psychological injury is acceptable.

  • Decision # 52/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the payment of the worker’s legal fees.

  • Decision # 51/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 49/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after May 27, 2020 in relation to the February 11, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 48/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 47/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being related to the November 26, 2019 accident; and2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 46/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 45/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s current psychological difficulties should be accepted as a recurrence; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing March 24, 2020.

  • Decision # 43/21

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a $4,000.00 penalty against the employer for violation of sections 19.1(1) and 19.1(2) of the Act.