Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

• Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
• If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
• If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
• If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
• Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
• Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.

Signed between January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 and January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Show decisions matching

Decision Type All decisions Workers Compensation Victims' Rights

Search

• Decision # 62/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 61/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medication Nabilone.

• Decision # 60/20
  

  Issue: 1. Accident of June 4, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 25, 2019; 2. Accident of May 8, 2019: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 20, 2019.

• Decision # 59/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 58/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

• Decision # 57/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid partial wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

• Decision # 56/20
  

  Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award for her neck; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award for Major Depressive Disorder; 3. Whether or not the worker is considered to be competitively unemployable or totally disabled; 4. Whether or not responsibility for the medications Mobicox, Tylenol #3, Celebrex and/or Diclofenac should be accepted.

• Decision # 55/20
  

  Issue: 1. Accident of March 1, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 2. Accident of June 11, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 3. Accident of August 1, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 4. Accident of August 20, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 5. Accident of July 9, 2013: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after July 26, 2013; 6. Accident of September 11, 2013: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2014.

• Decision # 54/20
  

  Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after December 16, 2017; 2. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits for the period December 17, 2017 to November 30, 2018; 3. Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after November 30, 2018.

• Decision # 53/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 52/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 31, 2017; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after December 28, 2017.

• Decision # 51/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 50/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 49/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be considered the deemed employer.

• Decision # 48/20
  

  Issue: 1. Date of Accident - April 251996: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated;2. Date of Accident - November 28, 2017: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

• Decision # 47/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 29, 2018.

• Decision # 46/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 45/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 25, 2018.

• Decision # 44/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 14, 2016.

• Decision # 43/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 11, 2019.

• Decision # 42/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker's restrictions should be made permanent.

• Decision # 41/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 40/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

• Decision # 39/20
  

  Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker requires physical restrictions; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 12, 2016; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

• Decision # 38/20
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 20, 2019.