Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 37/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 36/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after February 2, 2018.

  • Decision # 35/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is acceptable as being a consequence of the 2016 and/or 2017 accidents; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 24, 2018.

  • Decision # 34/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period April 8, 2019 to April 12, 2019.

  • Decision # 33/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 8, 2019.

  • Decision # 31/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 17, 2017.

  • Decision # 30/20

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 29/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 18, 2011 accident.

  • Decision # 28/20

    Issue: Date of Accident - February 28, 2011:Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the February 28, 2011 accident;Date of Accident - January 16, 2017:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 12, 2018.

  • Decision # 26/20

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6421 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 25/20

    Issue: Whether or not the effective date of August 18, 2003 for the implementation of the worker's permanent partial disability award for psychological impairment is correct; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for funding opioid pain medication.

  • Decision # 24/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 17, 2018.

  • Decision # 23/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for medical cannabis; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from January 16, 2019 to March 3, 2019.

  • Decision # 22/20

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for employment within National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6541 Security Guards and Related Occupations is appropriate.

  • Decision # 21/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's recurrent health difficulties are a consequence of the March 23, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 19/20

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 18/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 7, 2013.

  • Decision # 16/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 15/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective November 20, 2018.

  • Decision # 13/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 9, 2012.