Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 20/01

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 19/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 18/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 4, 2000; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for any treatment the claimant receives after February 4, 2000.

  • Decision # 17/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to benefits beyond December 20, 1998.

  • Decision # 16/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 22, 1999.

  • Decision # 15/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant should be compensated for time loss from work from January 15, 1993 to March 7, 1993; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the left knee surgery of August 30, 1995 including associated time loss from work.

  • Decision # 14/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to compensation benefits after August 12, 1999.

  • Decision # 13/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits after April 22, 1997 in relation to his compensable injury of March 6, 1996; and/or Whether or not the claimant sustained a new accident in or about June, 1996.

  • Decision # 12/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits for the period July 12, 1999 to July 30, 1999 inclusive.

  • Decision # 11/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 22, 2000; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's ongoing right ulnar nerve problem and any associated treatment.

  • Decision # 10/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 08/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2000.

  • Decision # 07/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an impairment award with respect to his tinnitus.

  • Decision # 05/01

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the back surgery of January 20, 2000 including any associated time loss, treatment or medical expenses.

  • Decision # 04/01

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cost of laser therapy administered between March 22 and April 20, 2000.

  • Decision # 03/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's vocational rehabilitation plan was appropriate; Whether or not the WCB should retrain the claimant as an automobile mechanic; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full wage loss benefits subsequent to September 3, 1999.

  • Decision # 01/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 131/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 130/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to receive payment of wage loss benefits for the periods of April 15, 1997 to February 18, 1998 and from March 4, 1998 to February 3, 1999.

  • Decision # 129/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond March 10, 1999.

  • Decision # 128/00

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.