Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 75/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the May 29, 2009 accident; and2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 14, 2014.

  • Decision # 74/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s 1% permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 73/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 17, 2019.

  • Decision # 72/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 8, 2020.

  • Decision # 71/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for a diagnosis of concussion resulting from the October 10, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 70/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 69/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 24, 2013 in relation to the November 15, 2012 accident; and 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right hip difficulties in relation to the November 15, 2012 accident.

  • Decision # 68/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is capable of employment in NOC 0711, Construction Manager; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 19, 2016.

  • Decision # 67/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for the right ear.

  • Decision # 66/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 65/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 2, 2016 in relation to the September 12, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 64/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 24, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 63/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 62/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after April 15, 2020.

  • Decision # 61/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment in relation to the February 5, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 60/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in their Special Additional Compensation benefit; 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further opioid medication; and 3. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cost of medical cannabis.

  • Decision # 59/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 4, 2019 in relation to the May 27, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 58/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after May 12, 2020.

  • Decision # 57/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 56/21

    Issue: Date of Accident - June 28, 2016: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits;Date of Accident - January 25, 2017: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 55/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits (other than chiropractic treatment) after July 31, 2018 and chiropractic treatment after August 14, 2018.

  • Decision # 54/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 3, 2019.

  • Decision # 53/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for a psychological injury is acceptable.

  • Decision # 52/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the payment of the worker’s legal fees.

  • Decision # 51/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.